Dream Align Rewire

Mental Science · 1847-1916

The Edinburgh Lectures on Mental Science

Thomas Troward

Troward's foundational text on mental science, drawing on his legal and philosophical background to make a rigorous case for the creative power of thought. His distinction between subjective and objective mind is one of the clearest early descriptions of the conscious/subconscious split.

The Tools

DAR workbooks & tools for The Edinburgh Lectures on Mental Science

Workbooks and tools for The Edinburgh Lectures on Mental Science are in development. Join the list to be notified when they launch.

Questions Answered

Questions about The Edinburgh Lectures on Mental Science

What is the key difference between the subjective and objective mind?+
Troward's objective mind is the rational, analytical consciousness - the tiny fraction that evaluates, decides, and judges. The subjective mind is the vastly more powerful subconscious, which processes all experience automatically and deductively: it accepts whatever premise the objective mind repeatedly impresses upon it and executes that premise without question. The power differential is enormous - modern neuroscience puts the subconscious at around eleven million bits per second versus roughly forty for conscious awareness. If you want to change your outer life, you must first change the subconscious premise it is currently executing.
What does 'thinking in the absolute' mean in practice?+
Thinking in the absolute means forming your mental image of the desired condition completely independent of current physical circumstances, past failures, or statistical probabilities. It is the deliberate suspension of the brain's Default Mode Network - the tendency to generate limiting self-narratives based on what has happened before. When you think in the relative, you attach conditions to the premise: 'this could happen if...' or 'this would be possible when...' Thinking in the absolute removes those conditions and holds the completed state as a present inner fact. Troward is describing what neuroscience calls mental time travel into the desired future - held not as fantasy but as settled internal reality.
How does the candle analogy explain why fighting negative thoughts makes them worse?+
Troward uses the candle to illustrate that light and darkness are not equal opposing forces - light is the presence of a cause, darkness is simply the absence of that cause. When you bring a candle into a dark room, the darkness does not fight back: it ceases where the light is present. This is why fighting negative thoughts with force backfires - the act of fighting concentrates neural focus on the very thing you are trying to eliminate. The correct response is not suppression but redirection: reintroduce the candle of positive attention, and the negative state dissolves not through force but through the simple absence of the attention that was sustaining it.

Want to be first to know when new Troward products launch?

Join the list - get the free workbook too →