New Thought · 1860-1911
The Science of Being Great
The final book in Wattles' trilogy applies the same systematic approach to human character that he gave to wealth in The Science of Getting Rich - arguing that greatness is not talent, privilege, or luck, but a specific way of thinking and relating to others that anyone can learn and practise.
What Wattles Got Right
Why The Science of Being Great still matters
The Science of Being Great makes an argument that almost no other success book of its era made: that greatness is available to everyone, not as an aspiration but as a practise. Wattles decoupled human excellence from biological inheritance, educational credentials, and financial position. That was a genuinely radical claim in 1911, and the psychological case for it is stronger now than it was then.
His most precise insight is the one in Chapter 12: you can never become great until you have overcome anxiety, worry, and fear. He understood - a full century before emotion regulation became the foundation of modern psychotherapy - that being anxious and unsettled is not a personality weakness but a cognitive one. An anxious mind cannot perceive clearly. A fearful mind cannot act from its best intelligence. Wattles named the problem that CBT would spend the next hundred years designing tools to address.
He also identified service as the mechanism of greatness, not its reward. Where the rest of the New Thought tradition was largely focused on individual accumulation, Wattles insisted that real greatness expresses itself through giving increase to others - leaving every person you encounter feeling more capable, more seen, more alive. That is not sentiment; it is the most durable description of value creation in the entire personal development tradition.
And his 'doing common things in a great way' principle is the most underrated idea in the book. He did not ask people to wait for a grand platform or a worthy occasion. He said: the stage you are standing on right now is sufficient. Do what is in front of you with full attention, genuine care, and complete integrity. That is where greatness actually lives.
Historical Context
How The Science of Being Great came to be written
The Science of Being Great was published in 1911, the year Wattles died. He was fifty years old, in poor health, and by his daughter Florence's account was finally living the results he had spent decades writing about. Like The Science of Getting Rich before it, this book was not assembled from other people's stories - it was written by someone in the middle of his own transformation.
The Progressive Era context matters. Wattles was not a detached metaphysician. He was an active Socialist Party of America candidate who ran for Congress in 1908 and for Prosecuting Attorney in 1910. He had read Karl Marx alongside Emerson and Hegel. He understood structural inequality from the inside - as someone who had spent decades experiencing it.
This creates the most fascinating tension in the book. Wattles the socialist knew that systemic barriers were real. Wattles the metaphysician wrote that anyone could overcome them through the Principle of Power. He never resolved the contradiction, but the fact that he felt it gives the book an ethical seriousness that most New Thought literature completely lacks.
He was also ejected from the Methodist Church for heresy, which positioned him at the intersection of radical politics and radical spirituality - a combination that was genuinely unusual in early twentieth-century America. The ethical insistence of Chapter 8, the demand for complete consecration to service over competitive dominance, is the product of that unusual background.
Core Principles
The 6 core principles of The Science of Being Great
The Principle of Power
Wattles' foundational premise is that every person contains an innate capacity for greatness - a 'Principle of Power' that is not distributed by birth, education, or circumstance but is universally available. What differs between people who express this capacity and those who do not is not the amount of power they have but the way they are directing it. This maps onto the modern psychological concept of intrinsic motivation: the research consistently shows that people operating from internal values and genuine engagement produce qualitatively different work than people operating from external pressure or fear of failure.
Creation over competition - applied to character
The same creative-versus-competitive distinction Wattles applied to wealth in The Science of Getting Rich appears in a different form here. The person seeking greatness through competitive dominance - outshining others, claiming status, accumulating credentials - is operating from the same scarcity mindset that keeps the wealth-seeker trapped in competitive thought. Real greatness, Wattles argues, does not compare itself to others. It simply does what it does as well as it can possibly be done. This is the psychology of intrinsic excellence, and it is incompatible with the chronic threat-state that competitive striving produces.
Emotional regulation as the prerequisite
Chapter 12 is the most clinically precise passage in Wattles' entire trilogy. 'You can never become a great man or woman until you have overcome anxiety, worry, and fear. It is impossible for an anxious person, a worried one, or a fearful one to perceive truth; all things are distorted and thrown out of their proper relations by such mental states.' He is describing what cognitive psychology calls cognitive narrowing under stress - the well-documented phenomenon in which a body in threat mode contracts attention, reduces perceptual range, and impairs higher-order reasoning. He identified the problem with precision. CBT, NLP, and body-based work provide the tools he could not.
Doing common things in a great way
Wattles used Abraham Lincoln as his primary example of greatness: a man who spent decades doing ordinary work - splitting rails, running a small store, practicing law in a frontier town - and doing each thing he did with complete attention and genuine integrity. Greatness was not revealed by the scale of Lincoln's eventual stage; it was built in all the ordinary moments that preceded it. This principle asks the reader to stop waiting for a worthier occasion and to bring their full capacity to what is already in front of them. Behaviourally, this is an activation practice: the habit of full engagement with present tasks rather than withholding effort for a future that may never arrive.
Consecration and service
Chapter 8 is the ethical heart of the book. Wattles demands that the seeker lay aside all thought of competitive dominance, reputation management, or personal aggrandisement, and dedicate their work entirely to giving increase to others - leaving every person and situation better than they found it. This is not spiritual sentimentality; it is a description of the values-aligned action that Acceptance and Commitment Therapy identifies as the most reliable route to sustained psychological wellbeing. People who work from genuine care for the quality and impact of what they are doing are consistently more engaged, more resilient, and more effective than people working from status anxiety or approval-seeking.
The mental exercise - alignment as a daily practice
Chapter 21 contains a structured daily practice: physical relaxation, followed by a verbal affirmation that aligns the body, mind, and soul into a single channel - 'I surrender my body to be ruled by my mind; I surrender my mind to be governed by my soul; and I surrender my soul to the guidance of God.' Stripped of the theological framing, this is a sequential settling exercise: bring the body into rest, align thinking with values, release the outcome. It anticipates the body-calming and values-clarification sequences used in contemporary therapy practice.
Chapter by Chapter
What's inside The Science of Being Great
Legacy
The legacy of The Science of Being Great
The Science of Being Great is the least-read book in the Wattles trilogy, overshadowed by The Science of Getting Rich after Rhonda Byrne credited it in The Secret. This is partly because its focus on character and service is a harder sell than a book explicitly about wealth. But it is, in many ways, the more psychologically sophisticated work.
Wattles' identification of anxiety as the primary blocker of greatness anticipates the central insight of cognitive behavioural therapy by half a century. His insistence on service as the mechanism of excellence rather than its reward anticipated what positive psychology's research on intrinsic motivation would confirm decades later. And his 'doing common things in a great way' principle is arguably the most practically useful idea in the entire New Thought tradition.
Where The Science of Getting Rich gave the world the creative-versus-competitive distinction, The Science of Being Great gave it something rarer: an account of success that is explicitly ethical. In a tradition that has been repeatedly hijacked by individualism and magical thinking, that distinction still matters.
What Was Missing
What Wattles could not have known
Wattles understood that anxiety and fear block greatness. What he could not provide was any mechanism for releasing them. He wrote before CBT, before body-based psychology, before any of the tools we now have. Knowing that worry distorts perception is not the same as having tools that interrupt the worry loop at the physical level where it is actually running.
His mental monism - the idea that thought alone determines circumstance - places the entire weight of life outcomes on the individual's inner state. For readers facing genuine structural barriers, this framing can tip from empowering to burdensome. Wattles was himself a Socialist Party candidate who understood systemic inequality; his metaphysics and his politics were in genuine tension, and he never resolved it.
The book also lacks the practical daily structure that makes principles into habits. Wattles tells you what the practice is - consecration, identification, idealization, realization. He does not give you a daily sequence that builds those states through consistent repetition at the level where real change actually happens.
Who This Is For
Who gets the most from The Science of Being Great
- ✓You've read The Science of Getting Rich and want to apply the same framework to who you are becoming, not just what you are building
- ✓You feel the gap between the person you are and the person you are capable of being - and want a systematic approach to closing it
- ✓You are drawn to service-oriented success rather than competitive achievement for its own sake
- ✓You notice anxiety, worry, or self-doubt getting in the way of your best work and want the psychological tools to address them at the root
- ✓You want to understand why Wattles was unusual in the New Thought tradition - and why his ethics still hold up
- ✓You do ordinary work and want to do it in an extraordinary way, without waiting for a grander stage
The DAR Response
We applied CBT, NLP & somatic work to The Science of Being Great
The DAR approach takes Wattles' ethical framework - which holds up remarkably well - and pairs it with the psychological tools he could not have known. The anxiety and fear he identified as blockers of greatness are addressed through CBT's cognitive restructuring, NLP's state management techniques, and body-based practices that work at the physical level where those states are actually held.
His 'doing common things in a great way' principle is translated into a daily practice structure: specific prompts for bringing full attention and genuine care to the actions already on your list, rather than waiting for inspiration or a worthier occasion. The cheat sheets, workbook, and tracker below are built on that premise - that character is made in the ordinary moments, not the extraordinary ones.
Go deeper
Apply The Science of Being Great with DAR
Join the list for free reading editions and practice resources as each classic launches.
Questions Answered
Questions about The Science of Being Great
What is the Principle of Power and why does Wattles keep returning to it?+
How is this book different from The Science of Getting Rich - do I need to read both?+
Wattles says anyone can become great by changing their thinking. What about structural inequality?+
What does Wattles mean by 'doing common things in a great way'?+
Is the NLP and CBT content in the DAR products consistent with Wattles' philosophy?+
Get free reading editions and weekly practice notes as new classics launch.
Join the list →More Wealth & Prosperity titles
You might also find these useful
More from Wallace D. Wattles
Other titles by Wallace D. Wattles in the DAR library